Book Review: What Scientists Think
Tuesday, December 26, 2006
by Jeremy Stangroom
If you've kept yourself up-to-date with most issues around popular science (something which this book is all about), you will find not much that is new. Featuring a series of interviews with twelve scientists working, undoubtedly enough, in popular research fields, one could say that this is a detailed exposition of what these scientists think.
I found a fair mixture of facts, ideas (and opinions) and Stangroom (a philosopher) often asks the opinion of these scientists about various issues (such as genetic modification). Something I find a bit puzzling is that some questions go out of these scientists fields. Perhaps the editor could've kept to more relevant questions. Just an observation.
Truth be told, a more correct title would have to be "What Some Scientist's Think", as while they may be pioneers or leaders in their respective fields, certainly one should not say they represent everyone as such.
The interviews cover a variety of topics (the popular and interesting, of course) such as sociobiology, ethics and post-modern influences on science.
Speaking as a Christian (somewhere in between moderate and conservative), I find most if not all of the ideas expressed are, well, rather liberal. So don't be surprised to find lack of respect for (no surprises) views such as pro-life (on abortion) and ID.
That said, I still enjoyed it a lot (despite most of the stuff here being...old, for me at least). I had some laughs too- the irony of a mathematician (Norman Leavitt, one of the interviewees) calling the Intelligent Design community as consisting primarily of mathematicians was not exactly very subtle. Of course, he knows it too, for he adds "nominally mathematicians". But still, I find it amusing.
We also see calls for greater public understanding of science (which is actually what this book is all about), something which I can say is something worth fighting for.
Makes a good read to keep yourself up to date (if you're a little behind on trends in popular science), as long as you're prepared to fathom some terms and think a little. Some prior brushing up on the scientific fields discussed about wouldn't hurt, either. There's always Wikipedia. =)
I guess that's all I have to say. Heh. A Blessed and Merry Christmas (and Boxing Day as well)!
If you've kept yourself up-to-date with most issues around popular science (something which this book is all about), you will find not much that is new. Featuring a series of interviews with twelve scientists working, undoubtedly enough, in popular research fields, one could say that this is a detailed exposition of what these scientists think.
I found a fair mixture of facts, ideas (and opinions) and Stangroom (a philosopher) often asks the opinion of these scientists about various issues (such as genetic modification). Something I find a bit puzzling is that some questions go out of these scientists fields. Perhaps the editor could've kept to more relevant questions. Just an observation.
Truth be told, a more correct title would have to be "What Some Scientist's Think", as while they may be pioneers or leaders in their respective fields, certainly one should not say they represent everyone as such.
The interviews cover a variety of topics (the popular and interesting, of course) such as sociobiology, ethics and post-modern influences on science.
Speaking as a Christian (somewhere in between moderate and conservative), I find most if not all of the ideas expressed are, well, rather liberal. So don't be surprised to find lack of respect for (no surprises) views such as pro-life (on abortion) and ID.
That said, I still enjoyed it a lot (despite most of the stuff here being...old, for me at least). I had some laughs too- the irony of a mathematician (Norman Leavitt, one of the interviewees) calling the Intelligent Design community as consisting primarily of mathematicians was not exactly very subtle. Of course, he knows it too, for he adds "nominally mathematicians". But still, I find it amusing.
We also see calls for greater public understanding of science (which is actually what this book is all about), something which I can say is something worth fighting for.
Makes a good read to keep yourself up to date (if you're a little behind on trends in popular science), as long as you're prepared to fathom some terms and think a little. Some prior brushing up on the scientific fields discussed about wouldn't hurt, either. There's always Wikipedia. =)
I guess that's all I have to say. Heh. A Blessed and Merry Christmas (and Boxing Day as well)!