Is Theology Futile?- Part 1

Friday, June 30, 2006
I am not a cynical person. Yet, on that rare occasion, I can't help but to wryly throw some remark according to that fashion. And so it is today. Today I rant (On second thoughts, no, I can't. I don't rant.). Alright, today I complain. Yes, that's a much better word. But it kind of means the same thing, does it not?

Ah, but who cares. As long as it is not ranting, it is fine by me. So here we go.

Firstly, let us discuss what precipitated this post, and this tone. I suppose the time to vent my feelings has come. (The fact that I am venting my feelings is something interesting, and something that I will discuss in my next post. But until then.) Not to pour it all out, mind you, but rather to let loose some steam. A little bit of it.

"No, (Insert name of my interlocutor here) you're wrong."

Boy, that's what is, without a doubt, the best preliminary response you can give to a person who has just given you his defense of his theological position (a very saccharine one, at that).

Then you proceed to give your refutation. And he gives you his rejoinder. And on and on it goes, until either side gets tired and the hated/loved "let's agree to disagree" statement comes up, and we both end our discussion jovially.

"No offense brother!"

Nope, none taken. You're just dead wrong when it comes to this and that and what have you. Then they come- the things you should have said during your conversation. Argh! If only you would've said them. Those damning objections that probably would have left him speechless, scrambling for an answer, all in vain. Heh.

Unfortunately, I've just digressed into pessimistic observation. That is just not me. (I make it a point to be an optimist no matter what)

But maybe there is no optimism to be had in this area called theology. I don't know, but if it's true, then, in the words of someone: "Let us make sure no others find out."

So the issue I bring up: Is theology futile? Is it a meaningless exercise in the esoteric? The speculative?

If no, then what end is there in sight for it? Why all the disagreement? Why all the differences? Does this not invalidate the very purpose of theology? To find truths about God, from his Word?

Too many questions, that's for sure. But I'll try to answer them all in the following posts. I've (in case you didn't know) already come to my conclusion long before I ever started writing this.

I guess it's up to you to decide whether it is a justified one.

So Much For Heterosexism.

Thursday, June 22, 2006
"Homosexuals were created by God to love people of the same gender."

-Katharine Jeffers Schori, new leader of the U.S. Episcopal Church.

So...uh...what were heterosexuals made for?

Something To Think About

Tuesday, June 13, 2006
The Christian scholar's aim is not to become a master of scripture, but to be mastered by scripture.

D.A. Carson

When We Doubt...

Friday, June 09, 2006
Thomas said to him, "Lord, we do not know where you are going. How can we know the way?" Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:5-6)

Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else believe on account of the works themselves. (John 14:11)

No, this is NOT a rant about my own doubts. Maybe if you go through this blog's archives, you might find one. T

This post is, instead, about other believers' doubts about the truth of Christianity.

Perhaps some Christians might have doubts as to whether some other religion happens to be right and theirs, wrong. This, I think, is uncommon. For a Christian, from the get go, ought to be already have some satisfaction in his or her religion (even if he might not be saved). This satisfaction is not unbiblical, however. But we must not, I think, base our assurance of salvation (or anything else, for that matter) on feelings alone. We have the Bible for that.

I certainly can't generalize the kind of doubts I have, but I would venture to say that most Christians doubt as to whether there is anything beyond this realm. If there is indeed, something supernatural, if there is indeed a God. The thought of materialism being in the end true strikes dread to us Christians. Yet that explanation of reality is something that we sometimes wander to. We wonder if it is indeed, true.

There is also the question if we can truly know anything for certain. The fact that there is so many conflicting facts (or "facts") thrown at us sometimes pulls us into the pit of discouragement.

However, that doesn't mean that we can never know anything for sure. It just means we haven't thought through these things properly. The concede that certainty is a castle in the sky on this ground alone would be, at best, laziness and unwillingness to sort out the facts.

The Bible can be clearly understood. It is reasonable to assume that God would ensure the perspicuity of Scripture for his children. At the very least, He would ensure that the most important parts of scripture can be clearly understood.

Looking at the Bible verses above, we see something clear and undeniable. Jesus said that he is The Way, The Truth, and The Life. Let us start from there.

Or else, "believe on the account of the works themselves". It means simply, to believe his miracles which attested to his Godhood. I think a case in point here is the resurrection. Jesus claimed that he was God. And he rose from the dead*. Go figure!
___________

* See here for a thorough article defending the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus.

What Kind Of Apologist Are You?

Wednesday, June 07, 2006
You scored as Classical Apologist.
You are a classical apologist! 
Marshaling arguments first based
on competing worldviews,
you can show reasons to
believe in the Christian faith. 
You have learned much from
C. S. Lewis, Norman Geisler, and
Peter Kreeft.

Classical Apologist

73%

Evidentialist

57%

Reformed/Presuppositional Apologist

56%

Fideist

13%

Atheist

0%

What kind of apologist are you?
created with QuizFarm.com


This is seriously messed up! I'm more of a presuppositionalist than anything else. And I'm certainly far from being a Norman Geisler!